<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thoughts along The Way &#187; responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teammueller.com/r/tag/responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teammueller.com/r</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Neglected: Political Education</title>
		<link>http://teammueller.com/r/neglected-political-education/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=neglected-political-education</link>
		<comments>http://teammueller.com/r/neglected-political-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[just thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teammueller.com/r/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My head is swimming in theology and politics, so I needed to come up for air and offer a few real practical thoughts. First, get educated by watching last night&#8217;s presidential debate (the last of them for this go around). Nothing can substitute for hearing them speak for themselves. All in all, I found most&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    My head is swimming in theology and politics, so I needed to come up for air and offer a few real practical thoughts.</p>
<p><strong>First, get educated</strong> by watching last night&#8217;s presidential debate (the last of them for this go around). Nothing can substitute for hearing them speak for themselves. All in all, I found most of the debate helpful toward this end:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object height="349" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DvdfO0lq4rQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DvdfO0lq4rQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="349" width="425"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Second, get educated</strong> by fact checking all the stuff the candidates said (and that their ads, surrogates, partisan pundits say). My favorite resource for this is <a href="http://factcheck.org">factcheck.org</a>, which I&#8217;ve found to be partial to one thing: calling the candidates, regardless of their affiliation, on their misuse of the facts. Use the radio and its talk show hosts for entertainment&#8230; but don&#8217;t make decisions based upon what you hear until you made sure the claims are actually backed up by hard facts. FactCheck can help you in that (and if you&#8217;ve already watched the debate, here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_3.html">their initial analysis</a> of the candidates inaccuracies). Also available is <a href="http://labs.google.com/inquotes/">InQuotes</a>, a new Google service that compares actual quotes from the two major candidates on a variety of issues.</p>
<p><strong>Third, get educated </strong>by comparing your views on your most important issues by using a tool like <a href="http://glassbooth.org/">glassbooth.org</a>. What I like about this one is that you can weight some issues more than others, or others not at all. After selecting your issue weightings, you&#8217;ll take a short quiz. Together, the weightings and your answers provide a correlation report with all the candidates and their stands on your issues. It&#8217;s not perfect of course, but it can help you consider the candidates in a little different light.</p>
<p>Okay, enough for now&#8230; back to the message prep for my second message from the &#8216;Neglected Series&#8217; on politics. If you missed my first message on politics, here it is: <a href="http://columbiaridge.org/blog/2008/10/12/political-intrusion-neglected-part-5/">Neglected, part 5: &#8220;Political Intrusion&#8221; Audio</a> : <a href="http://reed.teammueller.com/2008/10/13/neglected-politics/">Discussion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teammueller.com/r/neglected-political-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

